麻豆传媒

On March 6 and 7, students will have their say: either yes to improved student spaces, or no thanks, we脮re happy with what we脮ve got.

On the ballot is a proposal to transform student social and work spaces across three campuses, 12 spaces altogether. Proposed projects range from the renovations of existing student lounges, construction of a new building for student activities adjacent to the SUB, and a new studio/workspace for engineering, architecture and planning students. Under the plan, University Avenue is re-imagined with more trees, wider sidewalks and reduced traffic.

The projects have an estimated price tag of $25 million. Students will be asked to support the projects through a $10 per course levy collected through student fees. But they won脮t start paying until projects are largely completed, in 2009. In essence, a yes vote allows the university to borrow the money and pay it back over time with the student contributions.

脪I absolutely regard this as an opportunity,鈥� says Ezra Edelstein, president of 麻豆传媒 Student Union. 脪And, the other thing to emphasize is that students are going to have a say through this whole process.鈥澛�

The Referendum Students will vote on proposals for new student spaces in an online referendum March 6 and 7. The Question Do you support the addition of new and renovated student spaces on 麻豆传媒 campus to be funded through an ancillary fee of $10 per course, up to a maximum of $100 per student annually? The University will begin to collect this fee in the academic term when the project is completed (estimated September 2009) and will be responsible for all maintenance costs of these facilities. The design of the new and renovated spaces will be overseen by planning committees on which students will have equal representation with the university administration and all students interested in these projects will be actively consulted by the architects and the planning committee for their ideas about the best use of the space available. _ I support the collection of an ancillary fee for new and renovated spaces at 麻豆传媒. _ I oppose the collection of an ancillary fee for new and renovated spaces at 麻豆传媒.

The first taste of that process came during Imagine 07, a caf沤-style event held by the DSU on January 31 in the McInnes Room. The 200 students who attended brainstormed the kind of student spaces that work for them, and gave their first impressions of the proposals on the table.

Already there脮s been movement. Science students, for example, weren脮t聽crazy about the link building between the concrete-bunker-like environs of the LSC and the historic, ivy-covered A&A building. While they agree they脮d like study and social space, they felt there脮s got to be a better location.

脪The university is not committed to any聽single site,鈥� responds 麻豆传媒 President Tom Traves. 脪We presented the link building merely to give an idea of a building that combined study space and social space. So if it turns out that notion is a good one in general, but the location is second best, than we will obviously pursue a better option脡

脪In voting yes, students are not voting for a particular building design because in truth we haven脮t designed any buildings. All we脮ve said is, conceptually, there脮s a need. The design of spaces, outside and inside, hasn脮t been done because we脮re looking for approval from stu-dents.鈥�

Another sticking point was the Grad House. Many students expressed their fondness for the Grad House脮s grungy charm, a great place to relax with beer and samosas. But the structure is in sad shape, requiring $750,000 in repairs to bring it up to safety code.

Since the meeting, Dr. Traves has identified another house that could replace the Grad House; it脮s in much better shape and it脮s right across the street.

Mr. Edelstein says the Imagine event may be a first step in building trust between students and the university. He脮s encouraged by the administration脮s willingness to listen and adjust.

脪I think students underestimated the power they had at Imagine,鈥� says Edelstein. 脪Take the Grad House. Students said they didn脮t want something new. They wanted character and heritage. So the university found a new house for the Grad House. That脮s directly because of the people who came to Imagine and expressed those feelings. Same thing for the link building.

脪Those are two examples of how powerful students are going to be in this project.鈥�

If a majority of students vote yes in the referendum, student consultation will not only continue, it will expand. Interested students will be encouraged to get involved on planning committees and provide direction to architects. 脩 DN