Ethical review
Â鶹´«Ã½ follows the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS 2) to guide the ethical review of research applications involving Indigenous Peoples.
A Collaborative Research Agreement (CRA) or evidence of community engagement will be required to accompany Â鶹´«Ã½ Research Ethics Board (REB) applications for research involving Indigenous peoples and/or communities. The CRA outlines the nature and commitment of the partnerships and reflects the ethical considerations addressed in the overall REB application, including, but not limited to, research conduct, data-management plan, or data security. Read more in section 2.11.3 of the Guidance for Submitting an Application for Research Ethics Review For Prospective Research [PDF - 441 KB].
Indigenous Community ethics and protocols
Researchers should verify if the community or organization partner requires their own research ethics application and approval as well. Below are examples of community ethics and protocols:
Ensures the highest standards of research involving collective Mi’kmaw knowledge, culture, arts, spirituality, or traditions. Research that impacts treaty or Aboriginal rights is reviewed by Mi'kmaq Ethics Watch.
Provides guidance in the development of Mi’kmaq Ecological Knowledge Studies (MEKS), including clarification on the expectation of the Assembly. MEK is unique information that Mi’kmaq possess in regards to the lands, waters, plants and various animal species.
An independent body that reviews the PEI First Nations research proposals to determine ethical implications, assure the safety and rights of participants, and eliminate redundant research studies.
Promotes a shared understanding of the legacy of Inuit Nunangat research and connects this legacy to current research practices, defines Inuit expectations for the role of research in our communities, and identifies areas for action between Inuit and the research community.