鶹ý

 

Impact Ethics

Blood and Blood Components

Meeting patients' needs for plasma-derivatives is an . Canada is currently 100% self-sufficient in supply of whole-blood and fresh frozen plasma for transfusions (though donations are always required to keep it that way). However, altruistic donations of plasma for manufacturing of plasma-derivatives (that are used in with immunodeficiency and autoimmune diseases, bleeding disorders and other rare diseases) meet only 17% of the demand. The remainder of plasma products used in Canada are imported from commercial companies in the US and beyond who use paid donors. As such, Canada is of processed plasma products from other countries.

The World Health Organization recommends the  to ensure blood safety and availability; however, this recommendation is not always heeded. In 2013, (CPR), a private, for profit, organization planned to open pay-for-plasma clinics in Toronto and Hamilton. The company’s plans prompted public debate about the issue, and eventually, Ontario passed legislation banning compensation for blood and blood components. To date, Québec, Alberta, and have similar legislation. Although the clinics in Ontario did not open, CPR has active clinics in Moncton and Saskatoon. On February 25th, 2018 CBC Radio One program The Sunday Edition about financial compensation (cash payment) for plasma providers. On the debate, Dr. Sher (CEO, Canadian Blood Services) affirmed public concerns about the shortage of donations and explained that Canadian Blood Services’ plans to improve access, rather than incentivize participation through financial compensation. , “the question is not should we or should we not rely on remunerated donors. We do today. Eighty-five per cent of the supply comes from the United States, where they pay their plasma donors. The issue in Canada is, how do we want to solve the domestic security of supply concern? …Do we want a public sector solution which guarantees security of supply for Canadians, or do we welcome private sector players into the Canadian market who will sell the plasma anywhere on the international market to the highest bidder?”

At the moment, laws on blood and plasma donations are regulated at two levels. Health Canada regulates the safety of donations, and the . However, that division could change. The is currently passing through the senate. The Act proposes that in addition to further regulations laid out in the : ‘An establishment, other than Canadian Blood Services, must not collect allogeneic blood for remuneration or benefit for the donor unless the blood collected is of a rare phenotype’.  In effect, this act is an answer to Dr. Sher’s well-timed question. The act passed the Second Reading in the Senate on October 25, 2018, and is currently being reviewed by the Social Affairs Committee at the Senate. The regulatory text is open to the public for comment.  has spoken to the committee about the bill; if you are interested in commenting on the bill, submissions should be sent to:

For further information, view Senator Wallin on .

Last  updated  Winter 2019

Timeline

 

1980s

Tainted blood products, many of which came from paid at-risk populations in the United States, infected thousands of Canadians with HIV and Hepatitis C.

The  (1984-2014) facility opened a clinic in Winnipeg, paying “donors” with the extremely rare Rh-negative blood type.

1984

 

 

1997


recommended that Canada only accept payment for blood in rare circumstances.

A national for blood was initiated by the Canadian Standards Association.

 and  were created.

A for blood establishments was introduced by Health Canada.

1998

 

  2006 The Food and Drug Regulations were further amended to include provisions for human plasma collected by plasmapheresis.

 announced plans to open three clinics in Ontario – two in Toronto and one in Hamilton – at which it would pay “donors” for their plasma.

Feb 2013

 

 

 

Feb 2014

The Cangene Corporation was acquired by US based and the plasma “donation” facility in Winnipeg closed.

Following Bill 21, the , received  This bill, amongst other things, prohibits direct or indirect payment as well as receipt of payment for blood or blood components.

Dec 2014

 

 

2016

Canadian Plasma Resource (private, for profit) opened a clinic in Saskatoon.

Health Canada approved the Moncton CPR plasma collection centre.

July 2017

 

 

  May 2018 The Voluntary Blood Donations Act was introduced in the senate.

In the 1980s, tainted blood products – many of which came from paid at-risk populations in the United States – infected thousands of Canadians with HIV and Hepatitis C. At the time, the federal government appointed a Royal Commission (known as the ). In 1997, the  recommended that Canada only accept payment for blood in rare circumstances. On this basis, Ի were created as arms-length agencies to administer the donation and provision of blood and blood components. Since then, blood donation within Canadian borders has been heavily screened.  With the exception of the  (1984-2014) facility  in Winnipeg, which paid “donors” with the extremely rare Rh-negative blood type, blood donation in Canada remained altruistic.

Recent developments, however, have put Canada’s non-profit system under stress. In February 2013,  announced plans to open three clinics in Ontario – two in Toronto and one in Hamilton – at which it would pay “donors” for their plasma. One of these facilities was located  and another next to a drug-treatment facility. This raised concerns about the exploitation of at-risk individuals and about increased safety risks for recipients of paid-for blood.

In March 2013, the Ontario Minister of Health  [PDF - 89 KB] expressing concerns about the integrity of the altruistic blood donor system. A month later, Health Canada  followed by a public consultation process (to which Matthew Herder, Françoise Baylis, and Jocelyn Downie  [PDF - 26 KB]). Notably, in  the consultation process, Health Canada overstated the scope of payment for blood in Canada by incorrectly asserting that “the practice of payment for donations of plasma for the creation of plasma-derived pharmaceuticals has occurred in Canada for 30 years.” In point of fact, at that time, payment for plasma donations only occurred for Rh-negative blood at the  clinic in Winnipeg.

鶹ý a year later, in February 2014, Matthew Herder, Françoise Baylis, and Jocelyn Downie wrote  [PDF - 2.9 MB], urging the government to amend section 10 of the  in order to ban payment for blood and blood components. In due course, the Ontario government announced that it would  in the province. On December 11, 2014, Bill 21, the , received  This legislation empowers the Ontario government to control licensing for labs and specimen collection centers. It also distinguishes between plasma donations used in drug manufacturing and fresh blood and plasma used in transfusions. Schedule 1 includes provisions from  that prohibit direct or indirect payment as well as receipt of payment for blood or blood components.

In February 2016,  a private, for-profit plasma collection company, opened a clinic in . A little more than a year later, it opened a second . Initially compensation was set at $25.00 per “donation.” Currently, compensation is $50.00 per “donation”.  This money is credited to a Donor Value Card (a non-transferable VISA card) and qualified donors are limited to one “donation” per week. The company has reported that it hopes to open additional for-profit clinics in other provinces including . In May 2018, the Voluntary Blood Donations Act, which prohibits remuneration of blood and blood component donors, was introduced to the senate. The bill has passed its second reading and is currently under review by the Social Affairs Committee in the senate. As the act gets closer to being enacted, it begins to jeopardize CPR’s operations in Canada.

The World Health Organization recommends the  to ensure blood safety and availability. With limited research on the Canadian context, deciding how best to ensure a safe and sufficient supply that, at the same time, avoids the harms of exploitation means that policy choices must be made under conditions of uncertainty.

Following the 1997  recommendations, the altruistic blood donor system appears to have . That does not mean that all Canadians are happy with the system. Indeed, public responses to the CBC Radio One Programme The Sunday Edition hosted on February 25th, 2018 were largely critical of . Concerns were expressed about problems of access and inconveniences now attached to donation. In an  added the following week, host Michael Enright read a sample of the mail correspondence before asking Dr. Sher (CEO, Canaidan Blood Services) whether he was surprised that “people are so concerned about this?” Sher responded, saying: “This sends the opposite message to me. It indicates the very high level of support and commitment that Canadians have for their national blood service …this to me actually demonstrates how important Canadians view their blood system and I’m very, very proud that this many people would be interested in writing to you and saying we either have concerns, questions or ideas.” Canadians’ concerns about their blood system extend beyond whether payment should be permitted. However, that these problems would be solved by introducing a paid, for-profit donation system.

At the moment neither federal nor provincial legislation (outside of Québec, Ontario, Alberta and ) actually ban compensation for blood or blood components (including plasma).  to have claimed that "its  the safety and quality of the plasma that is collected for the purposes of transfusion or use in the manufacture of a human drug, which does not extend to corporate or operational decisions such as compensation to donors." Thus, for the time being, there is little to prohibit private for-profit companies in Canada from attempting to incentivize donation of blood or blood components through financial reimbursement schemes in those jurisdictions that lack relevant law and policy. This situation may not persist, as the Federal Government is currently debating the , which would heavily restrict the payment of donors across Canada.

For more in depth coverage of many of these issues, consult the work of Anne Kingston in: "" (Macleans Magazine, 15 Apr 2013), "" (Macleans Magazine, 14 Jan 2107), and "" (Macleans Magazine, 22 Nov 2017) as well as a response to the latter in the "" by Graham Sher, Executive Director, Canadian Blood Services.

Opinion Pieces

  • Wilson, A. (27 May 2018). . The Star.
  • Lanteigne, K. (6 Feb 2018). . TheStar.com.
  • Raza, D. (1 Jan 2018). . TheStar.com.
  • Desjardins, L. (22 Nov 2017). . Radio Canada International.
  • Smarsh, S. (Summer 2017). . VQR: A National Journal of Literature & Discussion, 93(3).
  • Mallick, H. (26 Apr 2016). .Toronto Star.
  • Anonymous. (19 Mar 2014). Toronto Star.
  • Rae, B. (7 Feb 2014). www.bobrae.ca.

Legal Developments

  • Young, I. (29 May 2018). . Global News
  • Bains, C. (26 Apr 2018). . CTV News.
  • Kingston, A. (22 Nov 2017). . Macleans Magazine.
  • Picard, A. (10 May 2016). .The Globe and Mail.
  • Crowe, K. (26 Apr 2016). . CBC News.
  • Babbage, M. (22 Jul 2014). The Canadian Press.
  • Anonymous. (20 Jun 2013). Diablogue.
  • Teotonio, I. (12 Apr 2013). The Star.

 

News 鶹ý For Profit Clinics

  • Greenberg, Zoe. (1 Feb 2019). . The New York Times.
  • Bissett, K. (17 Jun 2016). .The Brandon Sun.
  • McMillan, E. (5 Apr 2016). . CBC News.
  • Brend, Y. (21 Mar 2016). CBC News.
  • Boon, J. (11 Mar 2016). The Coast.
  • Anonymous. (9 Mar 2016). . The Chronicle Herald.
  • Graig, M. (18 Feb 2016). . Global News.
  • Grant, K. (24 Nov 2014). Globe & Mail.
  • Blackwell, R. (12 Dec 2013). The Globe and Mail.

Covering the National Debate on Payment

  • Enright, M. (4 Mar 2018). . CBC Radio: The Sunday Edition.
  • Enright, M. (25 Feb 2018). . CBC Radio: The Sunday Edition.
  • Kingston, A. (22 Nov 2017). . Macleans Magazine.
  • Dala, M., Doig, C., & Laupacis, A. (17 Apr 1014). Healthy Debate.
  • Kingston, A. (15 Apr 2013). Maclean's.

Select Impact Ethics Blogs

  • Getz, L.J. (26 Oct 2018). . IMpact Ethics. 
  • Getz, L.J. (24 Aug 2017). . Impact Ethics.
  • Nielsen, L.W. (22 Apr 2016). Impact Ethics.
  • Herder, M. (20 Apr 2016). . Impact Ethics
  • Behrmann, J., & Ravitsky, V. (30 Oct 2014). Impact Ethics.
  • Lanteigne, K. (21 Mar 2014). . Impact Ethics.
  • Haw, J. (17 Oct 2013). .Impact Ethics.
  • Herder, M., & Baylis, F. (6 Aug 2013). .Impact Ethics.
  • Dutt, M. (31 Jul 2013). . Impact Ethics.

Select Journal Articles

  • WHO. (1975 onwards). . World Health Organization.
  • WHO. (Jun. 2015). World Health Organization.
  • Health Canada. (27 Jun. 2013). . Drugs and Health Products.
  • Canadian Blood Services. (18 Feb 2016).
  • Glauser, W. (28 Jul 2015). . Canadian Medical Association Journal, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4855.  
  • Health Canada. (May 2014).
  • WHO & IFRCRCS. (2010). [PDF 7.79 MB]. World Health Organization & International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Socieities.  

Select Policy Contributions

Baylis, F., Downie, J., & Herder, M. (2013). [PDF - 29.5KB]. Submitted to: Office of Policy and International Collaboration (BGDT).

Overview

Meeting patients' needs for plasma-derivatives is an . Canada is currently 100% self-sufficient in supply of whole-blood and fresh frozen plasma for transfusions (though donations are always required to keep it that way). However, altruistic donations of plasma for manufacturing of plasma-derivatives (that are used in with immunodeficiency and autoimmune diseases, bleeding disorders and other rare diseases) meet only 17% of the demand. The remainder of plasma products used in Canada are imported from commercial companies in the US and beyond who use paid donors. As such, Canada is of processed plasma products from other countries.

The World Health Organization recommends the  to ensure blood safety and availability; however, this recommendation is not always heeded. In 2013, (CPR), a private, for profit, organization planned to open pay-for-plasma clinics in Toronto and Hamilton. The company’s plans prompted public debate about the issue, and eventually, Ontario passed legislation banning compensation for blood and blood components. To date, Québec, Alberta, and have similar legislation. Although the clinics in Ontario did not open, CPR has active clinics in Moncton and Saskatoon. On February 25th, 2018 CBC Radio One program The Sunday Edition about financial compensation (cash payment) for plasma providers. On the debate, Dr. Sher (CEO, Canadian Blood Services) affirmed public concerns about the shortage of donations and explained that Canadian Blood Services’ plans to improve access, rather than incentivize participation through financial compensation. , “the question is not should we or should we not rely on remunerated donors. We do today. Eighty-five per cent of the supply comes from the United States, where they pay their plasma donors. The issue in Canada is, how do we want to solve the domestic security of supply concern? …Do we want a public sector solution which guarantees security of supply for Canadians, or do we welcome private sector players into the Canadian market who will sell the plasma anywhere on the international market to the highest bidder?”

At the moment, laws on blood and plasma donations are regulated at two levels. Health Canada regulates the safety of donations, and the . However, that division could change. The is currently passing through the senate. The Act proposes that in addition to further regulations laid out in the : ‘An establishment, other than Canadian Blood Services, must not collect allogeneic blood for remuneration or benefit for the donor unless the blood collected is of a rare phenotype’.  In effect, this act is an answer to Dr. Sher’s well-timed question. The act passed the Second Reading in the Senate on October 25, 2018, and is currently being reviewed by the Social Affairs Committee at the Senate. The regulatory text is open to the public for comment.  has spoken to the committee about the bill; if you are interested in commenting on the bill, submissions should be sent to:

For further information, view Senator Wallin on .

Last  updated  Winter 2019

History

Timeline

 

1980s

Tainted blood products, many of which came from paid at-risk populations in the United States, infected thousands of Canadians with HIV and Hepatitis C.

The  (1984-2014) facility opened a clinic in Winnipeg, paying “donors” with the extremely rare Rh-negative blood type.

1984

 

 

1997


recommended that Canada only accept payment for blood in rare circumstances.

A national for blood was initiated by the Canadian Standards Association.

 and  were created.

A for blood establishments was introduced by Health Canada.

1998

 

  2006 The Food and Drug Regulations were further amended to include provisions for human plasma collected by plasmapheresis.

 announced plans to open three clinics in Ontario – two in Toronto and one in Hamilton – at which it would pay “donors” for their plasma.

Feb 2013

 

 

 

Feb 2014

The Cangene Corporation was acquired by US based and the plasma “donation” facility in Winnipeg closed.

Following Bill 21, the , received  This bill, amongst other things, prohibits direct or indirect payment as well as receipt of payment for blood or blood components.

Dec 2014

 

 

2016

Canadian Plasma Resource (private, for profit) opened a clinic in Saskatoon.

Health Canada approved the Moncton CPR plasma collection centre.

July 2017

 

 

  May 2018 The Voluntary Blood Donations Act was introduced in the senate.

In the 1980s, tainted blood products – many of which came from paid at-risk populations in the United States – infected thousands of Canadians with HIV and Hepatitis C. At the time, the federal government appointed a Royal Commission (known as the ). In 1997, the  recommended that Canada only accept payment for blood in rare circumstances. On this basis, Ի were created as arms-length agencies to administer the donation and provision of blood and blood components. Since then, blood donation within Canadian borders has been heavily screened.  With the exception of the  (1984-2014) facility  in Winnipeg, which paid “donors” with the extremely rare Rh-negative blood type, blood donation in Canada remained altruistic.

Recent developments, however, have put Canada’s non-profit system under stress. In February 2013,  announced plans to open three clinics in Ontario – two in Toronto and one in Hamilton – at which it would pay “donors” for their plasma. One of these facilities was located  and another next to a drug-treatment facility. This raised concerns about the exploitation of at-risk individuals and about increased safety risks for recipients of paid-for blood.

In March 2013, the Ontario Minister of Health  [PDF - 89 KB] expressing concerns about the integrity of the altruistic blood donor system. A month later, Health Canada  followed by a public consultation process (to which Matthew Herder, Françoise Baylis, and Jocelyn Downie  [PDF - 26 KB]). Notably, in  the consultation process, Health Canada overstated the scope of payment for blood in Canada by incorrectly asserting that “the practice of payment for donations of plasma for the creation of plasma-derived pharmaceuticals has occurred in Canada for 30 years.” In point of fact, at that time, payment for plasma donations only occurred for Rh-negative blood at the  clinic in Winnipeg.

鶹ý a year later, in February 2014, Matthew Herder, Françoise Baylis, and Jocelyn Downie wrote  [PDF - 2.9 MB], urging the government to amend section 10 of the  in order to ban payment for blood and blood components. In due course, the Ontario government announced that it would  in the province. On December 11, 2014, Bill 21, the , received  This legislation empowers the Ontario government to control licensing for labs and specimen collection centers. It also distinguishes between plasma donations used in drug manufacturing and fresh blood and plasma used in transfusions. Schedule 1 includes provisions from  that prohibit direct or indirect payment as well as receipt of payment for blood or blood components.

In February 2016,  a private, for-profit plasma collection company, opened a clinic in . A little more than a year later, it opened a second . Initially compensation was set at $25.00 per “donation.” Currently, compensation is $50.00 per “donation”.  This money is credited to a Donor Value Card (a non-transferable VISA card) and qualified donors are limited to one “donation” per week. The company has reported that it hopes to open additional for-profit clinics in other provinces including . In May 2018, the Voluntary Blood Donations Act, which prohibits remuneration of blood and blood component donors, was introduced to the senate. The bill has passed its second reading and is currently under review by the Social Affairs Committee in the senate. As the act gets closer to being enacted, it begins to jeopardize CPR’s operations in Canada.

Payment Debate

The World Health Organization recommends the  to ensure blood safety and availability. With limited research on the Canadian context, deciding how best to ensure a safe and sufficient supply that, at the same time, avoids the harms of exploitation means that policy choices must be made under conditions of uncertainty.

Following the 1997  recommendations, the altruistic blood donor system appears to have . That does not mean that all Canadians are happy with the system. Indeed, public responses to the CBC Radio One Programme The Sunday Edition hosted on February 25th, 2018 were largely critical of . Concerns were expressed about problems of access and inconveniences now attached to donation. In an  added the following week, host Michael Enright read a sample of the mail correspondence before asking Dr. Sher (CEO, Canaidan Blood Services) whether he was surprised that “people are so concerned about this?” Sher responded, saying: “This sends the opposite message to me. It indicates the very high level of support and commitment that Canadians have for their national blood service …this to me actually demonstrates how important Canadians view their blood system and I’m very, very proud that this many people would be interested in writing to you and saying we either have concerns, questions or ideas.” Canadians’ concerns about their blood system extend beyond whether payment should be permitted. However, that these problems would be solved by introducing a paid, for-profit donation system.

At the moment neither federal nor provincial legislation (outside of Québec, Ontario, Alberta and ) actually ban compensation for blood or blood components (including plasma).  to have claimed that "its  the safety and quality of the plasma that is collected for the purposes of transfusion or use in the manufacture of a human drug, which does not extend to corporate or operational decisions such as compensation to donors." Thus, for the time being, there is little to prohibit private for-profit companies in Canada from attempting to incentivize donation of blood or blood components through financial reimbursement schemes in those jurisdictions that lack relevant law and policy. This situation may not persist, as the Federal Government is currently debating the , which would heavily restrict the payment of donors across Canada.

For more in depth coverage of many of these issues, consult the work of Anne Kingston in: "" (Macleans Magazine, 15 Apr 2013), "" (Macleans Magazine, 14 Jan 2107), and "" (Macleans Magazine, 22 Nov 2017) as well as a response to the latter in the "" by Graham Sher, Executive Director, Canadian Blood Services.

Media Articles

Opinion Pieces

  • Wilson, A. (27 May 2018). . The Star.
  • Lanteigne, K. (6 Feb 2018). . TheStar.com.
  • Raza, D. (1 Jan 2018). . TheStar.com.
  • Desjardins, L. (22 Nov 2017). . Radio Canada International.
  • Smarsh, S. (Summer 2017). . VQR: A National Journal of Literature & Discussion, 93(3).
  • Mallick, H. (26 Apr 2016). .Toronto Star.
  • Anonymous. (19 Mar 2014). Toronto Star.
  • Rae, B. (7 Feb 2014). www.bobrae.ca.

Legal Developments

  • Young, I. (29 May 2018). . Global News
  • Bains, C. (26 Apr 2018). . CTV News.
  • Kingston, A. (22 Nov 2017). . Macleans Magazine.
  • Picard, A. (10 May 2016). .The Globe and Mail.
  • Crowe, K. (26 Apr 2016). . CBC News.
  • Babbage, M. (22 Jul 2014). The Canadian Press.
  • Anonymous. (20 Jun 2013). Diablogue.
  • Teotonio, I. (12 Apr 2013). The Star.

 

News 鶹ý For Profit Clinics

  • Greenberg, Zoe. (1 Feb 2019). . The New York Times.
  • Bissett, K. (17 Jun 2016). .The Brandon Sun.
  • McMillan, E. (5 Apr 2016). . CBC News.
  • Brend, Y. (21 Mar 2016). CBC News.
  • Boon, J. (11 Mar 2016). The Coast.
  • Anonymous. (9 Mar 2016). . The Chronicle Herald.
  • Graig, M. (18 Feb 2016). . Global News.
  • Grant, K. (24 Nov 2014). Globe & Mail.
  • Blackwell, R. (12 Dec 2013). The Globe and Mail.

Covering the National Debate on Payment

  • Enright, M. (4 Mar 2018). . CBC Radio: The Sunday Edition.
  • Enright, M. (25 Feb 2018). . CBC Radio: The Sunday Edition.
  • Kingston, A. (22 Nov 2017). . Macleans Magazine.
  • Dala, M., Doig, C., & Laupacis, A. (17 Apr 1014). Healthy Debate.
  • Kingston, A. (15 Apr 2013). Maclean's.

Further Reading

Select Impact Ethics Blogs

  • Getz, L.J. (26 Oct 2018). . IMpact Ethics. 
  • Getz, L.J. (24 Aug 2017). . Impact Ethics.
  • Nielsen, L.W. (22 Apr 2016). Impact Ethics.
  • Herder, M. (20 Apr 2016). . Impact Ethics
  • Behrmann, J., & Ravitsky, V. (30 Oct 2014). Impact Ethics.
  • Lanteigne, K. (21 Mar 2014). . Impact Ethics.
  • Haw, J. (17 Oct 2013). .Impact Ethics.
  • Herder, M., & Baylis, F. (6 Aug 2013). .Impact Ethics.
  • Dutt, M. (31 Jul 2013). . Impact Ethics.

Select Journal Articles

  • WHO. (1975 onwards). . World Health Organization.
  • WHO. (Jun. 2015). World Health Organization.
  • Health Canada. (27 Jun. 2013). . Drugs and Health Products.
  • Canadian Blood Services. (18 Feb 2016).
  • Glauser, W. (28 Jul 2015). . Canadian Medical Association Journal, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4855.  
  • Health Canada. (May 2014).
  • WHO & IFRCRCS. (2010). [PDF 7.79 MB]. World Health Organization & International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Socieities.  

Select Policy Contributions

Baylis, F., Downie, J., & Herder, M. (2013). [PDF - 29.5KB]. Submitted to: Office of Policy and International Collaboration (BGDT).